I'm suggesting the same change below in the bundle but maybe we can discuss it here. I'm simply adding "and" but perhaps the whole paragraph could be made a bit shorter somehow? In the docs it's fine but in the tooltip (thanks for the screenshot!) it looks a bit big.

I assume we're using a tooltip because we already have a lot of text in the popup and we're trying not to overwhelm the user.

Right. And that's what Katie suggested and approved

I definitely take the point of having a lot of info in the tool tip here too. I just think there should be someplace where a user can access the list of fields that are anonymized. A link to somewhere in the guide would be fine.

As discussed, I removed the tool tip and replaced it with an update to the popup that includes a link to the documentation that includes detailed steps on how to view an anonymous url as a reviewer would see it

Let me think about making this shorter, but Katie is very concerned about someone distributing an anonymized preview that might contain identifying info.

Before distributing an anonymized Preview URL it is recommended that you view the dataset as a potential user to verify that the metadata available does not reveal authorship, etc. You must first log out of Dataverse then open the dataset via the anonymized Preview URL you plan to distribute. By logging out first, you will be able to view the dataset as it would be seen by the anonymized Preview URL user. It may be necessary for you to further edit your dataset's metadata to remove identifying items before you distribute the anonymized Preview URL.

@pdurbin Just to be clear, in these instructions, we are assuming the user publishes the dataset and then goes back in and looks at it from a user perspective. Reading this, it may be unclear to the user whether they need to publish first and get a copy of the link before logging out. I know, hate being so specific but... This also implies if they want to review it, they are publishing a minor version with any additional anonymization they may need to do?

What about something like: "To verify that all identifying information has been removed or anonymized, it is recommended that you logout and review the dataset as as it would be seen by an anonymized Preview URL user." I think it could be fine to assume that a user understands the concept of "logging out to review" without having to explicitly talk them through each step and the reasoning behind.

I'm going to take another pass at this. what I was trying to get across is that the author/depositor should view the dataset via the anonymous url before distributing it. That way they can see what the anonymous reviewer would see and be alerted to any metadata that may reveal authorship, etc.

Interesting. I seem to remember that Preview URLs were deleted on publish but apparently that isn't the case anymore, if it ever was!

Maybe unclear. Trying to say that you can make a new ":general" preview url for subsequent drafts. Didn't mean to say that the prior one would continue to work. I'll re-word it.